Sometimes people play the game bigger or better, and every once in a while you get something really good. But most of the time, people just give you something better and in a way you get ripped off at some point. But I wonder if that’s the mentality
Hydroxycut uses, always pushing something bigger commercial wise rather than better. I mean obviously, bigger and better don’t go hand in hand when it comes to weight. If you’re bigger, generally not better, especially in terms of certain health concerns. But just because a diet pill promises to make you smaller for a small fee and uses big commercials does not make it better than the competition. Actually, it usually has the exact opposite effect. Bigger could also translate into celebrity promotion, which I believe
Hydroxycut also uses if I’m thinking right. But again, how much are you paying for the actual product vs the celebrity promotion. In the case of cheapo products, that leaves you in a whole world of hurt. I mean if they can afford to pay a celebrity salary and still provide you a diet pill for about $10-$12, do the math. They have to make their own profit and salary, salaries of employees, salaries of the celeb, bottles, etc. and this is all before actually paying for the costs of the production of one bottle of pills, let alone millions. I mean I understand that they get discounts on mass orders. But the discounts on a quality product and quality ingredients aren’t that good. Moreover, quality is usually harder to find and so they might run out of stock faster, because they would be waiting for the production company to get things in stock more often. None of it makes sense.